| Case name: |
Sokil v. Edmonton (City) |
|
|
|
| Jurisdiction: |
Canada - Alberta |
|
| Court: |
Inquiry proceeding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Parties: |
Name |
|
Appearing as |
| |
Sokil, Russell |
|
Objector |
| |
Sokil, William |
|
Objector |
| |
Edmonton (City) |
|
Authority |
|
| Before: |
Decision maker |
Designation |
|
Lewis, James L. |
Inquiry Officer |
|
| Lawyers: |
Name |
|
Appearing for |
| |
Mallon, Donald Patrick |
|
Objector |
| |
Frost, C. Edward |
|
Authority |
|
| Experts: |
Name |
Occupation |
Appearing for |
| |
Davison, E. Bruce |
Engineer |
Objector |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Decision: |
Report of an inquiry officer appointed pursuant to the Expropriation Act, R.S.A. 1980, c. E-16. The expropriating authority had proposed a partial taking of land from the Objectors for highway improvement purposes. The inquiry officer concluded that the proposed taking was not fair, sound or reasonably necessary for the achievement of the expropriating authority's objectives. Costs were awarded to the Objectors. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ExLaw citation: |
[1987] EXLAW 11 |
|
|
|
|
|
