Expropriation Law Centre

Cases


Menu

Advertisement

Expropriation Law Centre

Advertisement


Free Case Law
[Back] DECISION DIGEST  
Record no. 699
Case name: Sokil v. Edmonton (City)
Date: 1996-09-01
Jurisdiction: Canada - Alberta
Court: Arbitration proceeding
Release registry: [Subscribers only]
Court file: [Subscribers only]
Order no.: [Subscribers only]
Parties: Name   Appearing as
  Edmonton Transfer Ltd.   Claimant
  Sokil, Russell   Claimant
  Sokil, William   Claimant
  Sokil Express Lines (Western) Ltd.   Claimant
  Sokil Express Lines Ltd.   Claimant
  Sokil Holdings Ltd.   Claimant
  Edmonton (City)   Authority
Before: Decision maker Designation
Smith, Phyllis A. Arbitrator
Lawyers: Name   Appearing for
  Prowse, John C.   Claimant
  Thomas, Dennis R.   Authority
Experts: Name Occupation Appearing for
  Asch, Lloyd Traffic Consultant Claimant
  Edgar, Peter Real Estate Developer Claimant
  Gettel, Brian Stanley Appraiser Claimant
  MacKenzie, Kenneth C. (Kim) Planner Claimant
  Wall, James E. Appraiser Claimant
  Burton, John Real Estate Developer Authority
  McDougall, Terry Planner Authority
  Scheffer, Marius Traffic Consultant Authority
  Shaske, Edward J. Appraiser Authority
Taking type: [Subscribers only]
Valuation date: [Subscribers only]
Case elements: [Subscribers only]
Decision: Compensation award by an arbitrator for the partial taking in 1987 of a fee simple interest and a temporary easement from the Claimants' land pursuant to the Expropriation Act, R.S.A. 1980, c. E-16. The land was located in the City of Edmonton. The takings were required to permit the construction of a highway interchange.

The land was owned by two of the Claimants. The remaining Claimants were tenants who operated trucking businesses from the land. At issue was the highest and best use of the land and whether the taking had changed this use, the market value of the land taken, injurious affection and disturbance damages. The arbitrator made a total award to the fee simple owners of $264,531.12. A further award of $50,000.00 was made to the tenant Claimants for disturbance damages.
Comment: [Subscribers only]
Statute references: [Subscribers only]
Case references: [Subscribers only]
Related decisions:      
  Earlier
  [1987] EXLAW 11 Alta. Inquiry 1987-06-02
  Later
 
Neutral citation: N/A
ExLaw citation: [1996] EXLAW 4
Parallel citations:  
Reasons: [Subscribers only]
Digests contain original content produced by ExLaw and copyright in this content is held by Dicta Legal Services Ltd. (dba Expropriation Law Centre). Reasons for decision are the text of original decisions released by the court or tribunal and edited for accuracy where required. No copyright is claimed for these materials.
Join the Mailing List
Enter your name and email address below:
Name:

Email:

Subscribe 
Unsubscribe 
Online Subscription
Service
Online Subscription Service sign-up
Online Subscription Service log-in

Advertisement


© 2024 Dicta Legal Services Ltd.
Page last updated: October 14, 2023